GPT-6 vs Claude Opus 5.5 vs Gemini 3.1 Pro: Best AI Model Right Now
GPT-6 Astra, Claude Opus 5.5 and Gemini 3.1 Pro compared on benchmarks, coding, writing, plan prices and API costs, plus where Gemini 4 Argon fits, so you can pick the best AI model today.
On this page
- Key takeaways
- Quick answer: which is the best AI model right now?
- Meet the contenders
- Benchmarks: what the vendors claim
- Coding: Claude Opus 5.5 leads, Astra is close
- Writing, research and long documents
- Pricing compared: apps and API
- Limits, privacy and access
- Choose GPT-6, Claude or Gemini
- Frequently asked questions
- Our verdict: the best AI model for most people
The best AI model right now depends on the job: Claude Opus 5.5 is the strongest pick for coding, writing and long professional documents, GPT-6 Astra leads on science, agents and computer use, and Gemini 3.1 Pro is the cheapest of the three for heavy API work and the best value inside Google’s apps. If you just want one subscription, ChatGPT Plus and Claude Pro both cost $20 a month and are close enough that your daily tasks should decide.
This guide compares the best AI model from each lab as of 10 October 2026, using the vendors’ own published numbers, real plan prices and API rates. We also cover Gemini 4 Argon, which Google announced on 30 September 2026 but which almost nobody can use yet.
Key takeaways
- Claude Opus 5.5 (released 22 September 2026) beats GPT-6 Astra on Anthropic’s coding and office-work benchmarks, and its API costs $4 in and $20 out per million tokens, less than half of Astra’s $10 and $50.
- GPT-6 Astra wins on science and agent benchmarks and powers GPT-6 Pro, but most ChatGPT users actually chat with GPT-6 Sol, not Astra.
- Gemini 3.1 Pro is still in preview and lags the two newer flagships, but at $2 in and $12 out it is the budget frontier option, and Google AI Pro bundles it with 5 TB of storage.
- Gemini 4 Argon posts the best claimed scores on two tests, yet it is limited to vetted cybersecurity teams with no public release date.
- All benchmark numbers here are vendor claims run under different settings, so treat them as signals, not a final ranking.

Quick answer: which is the best AI model right now?
Here is the short version. Pick the row that matches what you do most.
| Your main task | Best model | Why | Cheapest way in |
|---|---|---|---|
| Coding and agents in a terminal | Claude Opus 5.5 | Leads Terminal-Bench 4.0 and FrontierCode in Anthropic’s table | Claude Pro, $20/mo |
| Writing, editing, reports | Claude Opus 5.5 | Top GDPval-AA office-work score, drafts need fewer edits | Claude Pro, $20/mo |
| Science, math, research agents | GPT-6 Astra | Higher Terminal-Bench-Science and AutomationBench than Opus 5.5 | ChatGPT Plus (Astra in Work and Codex), $20/mo |
| Everyday chat, images, voice | GPT-6 Sol in ChatGPT | Intelligent UI, broad features, huge ecosystem | ChatGPT Plus, $20/mo |
| Cheap high-volume API work | Gemini 3.1 Pro | $2/$12 per million tokens up to 200K prompts | Gemini API, pay as you go |
| Google Workspace users | Gemini 3.1 Pro | Built into Gmail, Docs and Vids on Google AI Pro | Google AI Pro, $19.99/mo |
If you want the background on OpenAI’s three model sizes first, read our explainer on GPT-6 Astra vs Sol vs Luna, because the name “GPT-6” covers several models with very different prices.
Meet the contenders
GPT-6 Astra (OpenAI)
GPT-6 Astra is OpenAI’s flagship. OpenAI calls it “the world’s most intelligent and aligned model” on its GPT-6 Astra launch page. It has a 1,050,000-token context window and up to 128,000 output tokens. In ChatGPT, Astra powers GPT-6 Pro on the Pro, Business and Enterprise plans and runs inside ChatGPT Work and Codex on Plus and above.
The everyday ChatGPT chat model is different. Since 7 October 2026, paid plans chat with GPT-6 Sol and Free and Go users get GPT-6 Luna, both with the new Intelligent UI that answers with charts, buttons and small tools. Our guide to ChatGPT Intelligent UI shows what that looks like.
Claude Opus 5.5 (Anthropic)
Claude Opus 5.5 launched on 22 September 2026 and is the default model in Claude Code on paid plans. It has a 1M-token context window, 128K max output and costs $4 in and $20 out per million tokens on the API, down from $5 and $25 for Opus 5. Anthropic says it costs about 40% less to run than Opus 5 on typical workloads. It always thinks before answering; you cannot switch thinking off.
Gemini 3.1 Pro (Google)
Gemini 3.1 Pro is Google’s only generally available Pro model, and it is still labeled preview in the API. Free Gemini users get “varying access to 3.1 Pro”, while Google AI Pro subscribers get higher access, a 1M-token context window and Gemini inside Gmail, Docs and Vids. It is the oldest of the three flagships here, which shows on the newest benchmarks.
Waiting in the wings: Gemini 4 Argon
Google’s Gemini 4 Argon announcement describes a frontier model for coding, enterprise work and cyber defense. As of 10 October 2026 it is rolling out only to trusted defenders in Google’s Fairwind Program. Paid API customers and Google AI Ultra subscribers come next, with no date. We cover it in detail in our Gemini 4 Argon guide, but you cannot build on it today.
Benchmarks: what the vendors claim
Benchmarks are standardized tests. Each lab picks the ones that flatter it, runs them at different effort settings, and sometimes reports a rival’s score as published by that rival. Read this table as “who claims what”, not as an independent lab test.
| Benchmark (what it tests) | Claude Opus 5.5 | GPT-6 Astra | Gemini 4 Argon |
|---|---|---|---|
| Terminal-Bench 4.0 (coding agents in a terminal) | 66.4% | 57.9% | Not published |
| FrontierCode v1.1 Main (hard coding) | 54.4% | 53.3% | Not published |
| GDPval-AA v2.1 (office and knowledge work, Elo) | 1846 | 1542 | Not published |
| Humanity’s Last Exam with tools (expert questions) | 67.7% | 57.2% | Not published |
| Terminal-Bench-Science 0.1 (science tasks) | 58.7% | 64.6% | Not published |
| AutomationBench by Zapier (business automation) | 40.0% | 41.4% | 51.3% |
| DeepSWE v1.1 (long software tasks) | Not published | 74.1% | 77.9% |
Sources: Anthropic’s Opus 5.5 page (max effort), OpenAI’s Astra page and Google’s Argon post. We did not find Gemini 3.1 Pro scores on these newer tests in the sources we checked, so it is left out of the table rather than guessed.
Watch out: Anthropic itself warns that benchmark margins may not predict real-world differences. A 1 to 2 point gap, like AutomationBench between Opus 5.5 and Astra, is noise for most people. Test both on your own tasks before switching.
The pattern is still useful. Opus 5.5 leads on coding and office work, Astra leads on science and edges ahead on automation, and Argon claims the top automation and long-coding scores but is not available. Anthropic also says Opus 5.5 at default effort matches Astra on Terminal-Bench 4.0 for about 40% of the cost, which matters more than the raw score if you pay per token.
Coding: Claude Opus 5.5 leads, Astra is close
For developers, Opus 5.5 is the model to beat. It tops Terminal-Bench 4.0 and FrontierCode in Anthropic’s table, and it comes bundled with Claude Code on every paid Claude plan, sharing one usage pool with chat. GPT-6 Astra runs inside Codex on ChatGPT Plus and above, where OpenAI estimates 5 to 45 Astra messages per 5-hour window on Plus.
Gemini 3.1 Pro is usable for coding through Google’s Jules agent and Antigravity on AI Pro, but on the newest agentic tests it is not in the same class as the two newer models. If you want tool-by-tool advice, our best AI coding assistants list and the Claude Code vs Cursor comparison go deeper.
Writing, research and long documents
All three handle about a million tokens of context in their top configurations, which is several long reports at once. Our context window explainer explains what that means in practice. The difference is in output quality and limits.
- Claude Opus 5.5 has the highest GDPval-AA office-work score and, in our everyday use, writes long drafts that need the fewest edits. It is our pick for reports, proposals and editing.
- GPT-6 Astra and Sol are excellent researchers. Astra posts strong browsing (BrowseComp 91.5%) and long-context retrieval scores, and ChatGPT’s deep research and Intelligent UI make answers easy to scan.
- Gemini 3.1 Pro shines when your documents already live in Google Drive, because Gemini reads them in Docs and Gmail without uploads. Gemini Notebook (formerly NotebookLM) is a strong free study tool on top.
For a head-to-head on writing only, see our ChatGPT vs Claude comparison and the Claude vs Gemini guide.
Pricing compared: apps and API
Consumer plans
| Plan | Price | Which top model you get |
|---|---|---|
| ChatGPT Free / Go | $0 / $8 a month | GPT-6 Luna in Chat |
| ChatGPT Plus | $20 a month | GPT-6 Sol in Chat, GPT-6 Astra in Work and Codex |
| ChatGPT Pro | $100, $200 or $500 a month | GPT-6 Pro (Astra), with weekly limits |
| Claude Free | $0 | Sonnet and Haiku, no Opus |
| Claude Pro | $20 a month ($17 annual) | Opus 5.5 plus Claude Code |
| Claude Max | $100 or $200 a month | 5x or 20x Pro usage |
| Gemini Free | $0 | Gemini 3.6 Flash, varying 3.1 Pro access |
| Google AI Pro | $19.99 a month (Rs 1,950 in India) | Higher Pro model access, 1M context, 5 TB |
| Google AI Ultra | From $99.99 a month | Highest limits, first in line for Argon |
The key detail: $20 on ChatGPT Plus does not buy you unlimited Astra in chat, while $20 on Claude Pro does include Opus 5.5, within a five-hour limit of roughly 45 short messages. Full plan details are in our ChatGPT pricing guide, Claude pricing guide and Gemini pricing guide.
API prices per million tokens
| Model | Input | Output | Cached input |
|---|---|---|---|
| GPT-6 Astra | $10.00 | $50.00 | $1.00 |
| GPT-6.1 Sol | $2.00 | $10.00 | $0.10 |
| Claude Opus 5.5 | $4.00 | $20.00 | $0.20 |
| Gemini 3.1 Pro (up to 200K prompt) | $2.00 | $12.00 | $0.20 |
| Gemini 4 Argon (intro, not public) | $2.00 | $10.00 | 95% off input |
A worked example: a job with 2 million input tokens and 500,000 output tokens costs $20 + $25 = $45 on Astra, $8 + $10 = $18 on Opus 5.5, and $4 + $6 = $10 on Gemini 3.1 Pro. Watch the long-prompt rules too. OpenAI bills the whole request at 2x input and 1.5x output above 272K input tokens, and Gemini 3.1 Pro rises to $4 and $18 above 200K. Claude 4.6 and later models have no long-context surcharge. See our guides to OpenAI API pricing, Claude API pricing and Gemini API pricing for every model.
Save money: You rarely need a flagship for every request. Send simple tasks to GPT-6.1 Sol, Sonnet 5.5 or Gemini 3.8 Flash and keep Astra or Opus for the hard ones. Our guide to model routing shows how.
Limits, privacy and access
- Usage caps. GPT-6 Pro “does not include unlimited use”; Pro $200 gets 200 GPT-6 Pro messages a week. Claude limits reset every five hours with weekly caps on top. Google describes AI Pro as 4x the Free plan’s limits.
- Training on your data. ChatGPT Business, Enterprise and Edu content is not used for training by default, and consumer users can switch it off in Data controls. Claude consumer users choose whether chats train models; Team, Enterprise and API are excluded. Opus 5.5 is available with zero data retention on the API.
- Safety routing. Opus 5.5 reroutes most cybersecurity tasks to Opus 4.8 unless you are verified. Argon’s unguarded cyber abilities are why Google is releasing it so slowly.
- India. ChatGPT accepts UPI for Go and Plus. Google AI Pro is Rs 1,950 a month. Claude introduced rupee pricing in July 2026, reported at about Rs 2,000 for Pro.
Choose GPT-6, Claude or Gemini
Choose GPT-6 (ChatGPT) if
- You want one app for chat, images, voice, research and agents, with interactive Intelligent UI answers.
- Your work leans on science, math or long autonomous tasks in ChatGPT Work.
Choose Claude Opus 5.5 if
- You code, write or edit long documents most of the day.
- You pay per token and want flagship quality at less than half of Astra’s price.
Choose Gemini 3.1 Pro if
- You live in Gmail, Docs and Drive, or want storage and YouTube Premium Lite bundled in.
- You run high-volume API jobs where price beats peak quality, or you want early Argon access on Ultra.
Still undecided on the chat apps themselves? Our ChatGPT vs Gemini comparison covers features beyond the model.
Frequently asked questions
Is GPT-6 better than Claude Opus 5.5?
It depends on the task. On Anthropic’s published benchmarks, Opus 5.5 beats GPT-6 Astra on terminal coding, hard coding, office work and Humanity’s Last Exam, while Astra wins on science tasks and is slightly ahead on AutomationBench. For coding and writing, Opus 5.5 is our pick. For science-heavy research and ChatGPT’s wider feature set, GPT-6 is stronger. Both are close enough that testing on your own work is worth it.
What is the best free AI model right now?
Free ChatGPT users get GPT-6 Luna with Intelligent UI, Claude Free offers Sonnet and Haiku models, and Gemini Free gives Gemini 3.6 Flash with varying access to Gemini 3.1 Pro. None of the free plans include GPT-6 Astra or Claude Opus 5.5. For most people, Gemini Free is the most generous bundle, and ChatGPT Free is the most polished everyday chat.
Can I use Gemini 4 Argon yet?
Not unless you are part of Google’s Fairwind Program for trusted cybersecurity defenders. Google says paid Gemini API customers and Google AI Ultra subscribers will get it next, but as of 10 October 2026 it gave no date, Argon was not in the Gemini app on any plan and it was not on the public API pricing page. Use Gemini 3.1 Pro or Gemini 3.8 Flash for now.
Which AI model is cheapest on the API?
Among the three flagships, Gemini 3.1 Pro is cheapest at $2 input and $12 output per million tokens for prompts up to 200K tokens. Claude Opus 5.5 costs $4 and $20, and GPT-6 Astra costs $10 and $50. If you do not need a flagship, GPT-6 Luna at $0.10 and $0.50 is far cheaper still, and Batch APIs from all three labs cut prices by 50%.
Does ChatGPT Plus include GPT-6 Astra?
Partly. ChatGPT Plus at $20 a month includes GPT-6 Astra inside ChatGPT Work and Codex, with estimated limits of 5 to 45 Astra messages per five-hour window. Regular chat on Plus uses GPT-6 Sol. GPT-6 Pro, which is powered by Astra, needs a Pro, Business or Enterprise plan and still has weekly caps.
Our verdict: the best AI model for most people
If you code or write for a living, Claude Opus 5.5 is the best AI model right now: it leads the coding and office-work benchmarks its maker published, it is cheaper per token than GPT-6 Astra, and Claude Pro puts it in your hands for $20 a month. If you want the broadest assistant with the best science and agent performance, GPT-6 in ChatGPT Plus is the safer all-rounder. Gemini 3.1 Pro is the value pick for Google Workspace users and budget API builders, and Gemini 4 Argon is one to watch once Google opens it up. Prices and model access change often, so confirm current plans on each vendor’s pricing page before you subscribe.
Pricing and features are checked at the time of writing and can change. Some links may be affiliate links, which never affect our verdicts.